Ball, Donald B. Accessed 15 October In this sample, there are no sites South Carolina, like Maryland, follows the that date after the s in the Chesapeake and trend, with the Heighton and Deagan formula no site earlier than in the Carolinas. College Station, TX. The Heighton and Deagan formula second test show that the dates from all three produced the best mean date for tests 1, 3, and formulas in the fifth time period were 4, having the smallest difference between the statistically different from the hypothesized formula result and the hypothesized date, mean date.
There were 38 majority of the time; only during the third time features and 1, stems included in the first period did it not have the smallest divergence.
The Scholarship. This is because are striking, with sites in the Chesapeake the formula results are widely varied in North producing much better results than in the Carolina, from as much as 82 years earlier and Carolinas. The regional variation may also and archaeologists need to evaluate what these be due to differences in trade patterns between dates are used for and how they arrive at the the two areas.